Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 2941 - 2960 of 5,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In truth, though, for slogan marks the public’s perception is not the same as for other types of marks and, therefore, assessing their distinctiveness results more difficult.In the light of Audi v OHIM the General Court addressed some typical issues affecting slogan marks. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
In light of the US Supreme Court’s decision this week not to grant review in Iskanian v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm by Joe Consumer
If you were paying attention to arguments yesterday, you may have heard about this one: Williams-Yulee v. the Florida Bar, “a challenge to a Florida rule barring judicial candidates from personally requesting campaign contributions. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:17 pm by Joy Waltemath
The case is of interest to employment lawyers in the public sector primarily because of the court’s analysis of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a “sister statute” to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and one which allows individuals “to seek religious accommodations pursuant to the same standard as set forth in RFRA,” in light of the similarities to employers seeking to apply a grooming and appearance policy to their employees… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
And, of course, we have seen this argument before – when Virginia defended its law barring different-race marriages in Loving v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
The trial court held the class action was barred because Iskanian had signed an arbitration agreement waiving any participation in a “class action” or “representative action,” but the California Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Goodwin Liu, held that because PAGA allowed an individual to act as a “proxy” for the state, the Federal Arbitration Act’s “goal of promoting arbitration as a means of private dispute resolution does not… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am by Dean Freeman
This is why many states, including Florida, have laws barring officers from acting with reckless disregard for the safety of others – regardless of the circumstances (F.S. 316.072(5)(c)). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
 §107 of the US Copyright Act states that the fair use of a work is not an infringement of copyright. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
Section 101.106 election of remedies does not foreclose a federal claim against state officials TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES A/K/A BRENHAM STATE SCHOOL, ANTHONY V. [read post]