Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 2941 - 2960 of 3,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 2:52 am
 90%); WOMEN (89%); CRIMINAL LAW (78%); LEGAL EDUCATION (78%); US ENVIRONMENTAL LAW (78%); ENVIRONMENTAL LAW (78%); SUPREME COURTS ( ...CONNECTICUT, USA (90%); NEW YORK, USA (79%)     2. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
Yet, only a few years later, Cardoza would go on to the Supreme Court and play a major role in the judiciary for most of the 1930s. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
Supreme Court breathed fresh life into the trial court’s power and obligation to review expert witness opinions and to exclude unsound opinions.[7] Several months before the Supreme Court charted this new direction on expert witness testimony, the silicone breast implant litigation, fueled by iffy science and iffier scientists, erupted.[8] In October 1994, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation created MDL 926, which consolidated the… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
The Kentucky Supreme-4-Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction related to UIFSA in Nordike v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
The Kentucky Supreme-4-Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction related to UIFSA in Nordike v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm by Bona Law PC
Market Power Over Locked-In Customers In the Supreme Court’s classic tying case, Kodak, the defendant required purchasers of replacement parts for its copiers to also purchase copier service from it. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:35 am by Molly DiBianca
You'll recall from Post 2 in this series that this first step was explained by the Supreme Court in its Garcetti decision. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Since the possessing museum and owners’ descendant had already reached a settlement, the court did not determine whether Schoeps’ predecessor’s loss of the paintings met the definition of having changed hands under involuntary means. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:35 am
 SUPREME COURTS (64%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (64%) NEW YORK, USA (90%)   20. [read post]