Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
Thompson, et al., US 10th Cir. (6/11/13)Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative LawAppellant Keith Cressman objected to the image on the standard Oklahoma license plate. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:41 am
” Myriad discovered the precise location and sequence of what are known as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:34 am
In such a case, would the Port be (in American Trucking Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm
This standard is used to determine whether Myriad’s patents claim a "new and useful . . . composition of matter," §101, or claim naturally occurring phenomena. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
” (quoting Mayo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Steno v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:05 am
This case presents an ideal opportunity for this Court to demonstrate that under the right circumstances, a creator of lighting designs can meet the elevated standards of the Copyright Act for protection of useful articles under the minimal standards for stating a cause of action of infringement under Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
(North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:10 am
University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
They can be used to target individuals or groups with great precision and accuracy; sometimes, with amazing simplicity and often at little expense. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Brennan, “Can Epidemiologists Give Us Some Specific Advice? [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:01 am
Pinpointing the precise chemcial causing the exposure can be difficult, but a worker can attempt to obtain the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) from the employer that identifies chemicals/toxins being used. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
The State Supreme Court's administrative order urged judges to use these instructions in all criminal trials.The Sixth Circuit distinguished Lancaster from Rogers v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:34 pm
The reason I bring this up is because of a very recent Ninth Circuit case, Drummond v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Here, the emails themselves refuted agency, as they "criticized" what was being drafted (precisely why plaintiff wanted to use the emails). [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:30 am
And this is precisely the context in which I believe Apple's reply brief makes the most compelling points. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:50 am
In an ACLU case currently pending before the Supreme Court, Arizona v. the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, ACLU clients are challenging the State of Arizona's attempt to impose additional barriers to voter registration beyond the requirements of the standardized federal voter registration form. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
Use of a Collection Device. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:15 am
Resources Code, § 21177(a),(b); see Galante Vineyards v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 1:03 am
” [Chiron Corp. v. [read post]
