Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. L." Results 2941 - 2960 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
That test requires a court to find that a state's assertion of personal jurisdiction violates the Due Process Clause on the basis of a give factor balancing test, which refers to the defendant's interest, the plaintiff's interest, the interest of the forum, judicial efficiency and economy, and substantive policy concerns. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
That test requires a court to find that a state's assertion of personal jurisdiction violates the Due Process Clause on the basis of a give factor balancing test, which refers to the defendant's interest, the plaintiff's interest, the interest of the forum, judicial efficiency and economy, and substantive policy concerns. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
That test requires a court to find that a state's assertion of personal jurisdiction violates the Due Process Clause on the basis of a give factor balancing test, which refers to the defendant's interest, the plaintiff's interest, the interest of the forum, judicial efficiency and economy, and substantive policy concerns. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 5:25 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
Jurisdiction under Article 227 is exercised by the High Court for vindication of its position as the highest judicial authority in the State. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:00 am by Illan Rua Wall
Bedau states ‘Anyone commits an act of civil disobedience if and only if he acts illegally, publicly, non-violently, and conscientiously with the intent to frustrate (one of) the laws, policies, or decisions of his government. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Owiso Owiso
This would considerably limit the Ethiopian government’s discretion regarding the nature and form of accountability, limit the space for self-interested manoeuvres by the government, and make it easier to hold the government accountable to specific and measurable commitments. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada  In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]