Search for: "Smith v. Day" Results 2941 - 2960 of 4,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
This judgment sets the clock back to the days of Dixon of Dock Green. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
There were news stories about the decision in the Press Gazette On Wednesday 20 January 2016 Nicol J heard a one day preliminary issue trial on meaning in the case of Hiranandani-Vandrevala v Times Newspapers Limited. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm by Ken
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
And yet this week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Baze v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Majority qualifies the question by referring to certain facts of record: "Does a party 'prevail' if it obtains a temporary restraining order the day after it files suit . . . but 22 days later is denied a preliminary injunction because the opposing party's voluntary change of position moots the case? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
from Graham Smith The recent Donald Ashby (sub nom Ashby Donald) decision of the European Court of Human Rights has revived interest in the relationship between copyright and freedom of expression. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:28 am
"Ironically, three other Central Florida federal judges have upheld the law's constitutionality in other cases, though one last year said he wished he could have dropped the case the next day if the suspect had registered. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Browning, Browning & Smith LLC, Marietta, and Stephen C. [read post]
The Court of Appeals of Washington recently analyzed what constitutes a violation of the right to a speedy trial, in State v. [read post]