Search for: "State v Smith" Results 2941 - 2960 of 11,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:51 pm by David Smith
David Smith of Anthony Gold solicitors reports on a new Court of Appeal decision that will  seriously affect landlords and agents. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:38 am by David Smith
Oxford has amended its fee structure and has stated that it will not charge a fee for an HMO licence variation from 1 September 2013. [read post]
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 5:06 am by INFORRM
” This exclusion is nowhere stated in the White Paper. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm by Shahram Miri
However, a recent appellate case surprisingly did not follow that line of thinking.Carne v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:19 pm by Shahram Miri
However, a recent appellate case surprisingly did not follow that line of thinking.Carne v. [read post]