Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 7,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 11:15 am
United Auto Ins. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Many of these are drawn from research for the book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States as well as work done for the American Law Institute’s Principles of Law—Election Administration project. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:04 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:53 pm
v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 2:56 pm
United States, a 1976 U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
Fund v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
In 2017, even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
Most of the justices did not indicate strong views in their questioning. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
However, the law allows the NSA to select targets who are non-U.S. persons located outside the United States on the basis of very broad criteria. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
Thus, even if one is ultimately of the view that Munaf and Omar (et al.) don't have strong substantive claims, it should be up to U.S. courts, to the extent that the petitioners allege the constructive custody of the United States, to decide. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am
The brief concludes with the assertion that no court in the United States has been asked to determine whether a language is subject to copyright protection, and they call on the judge to “declare that there is no basis in either law or policy to allow copyright in a spoken language. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
