Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 2941 - 2960 of 11,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by luiza
The defendants attempted to get this suit dismissed on the basis of a provision called “the public disclosure bar”, which states that a whistleblower suit cannot be based on information that is broadly, publicly available and that takes no specialized expertise to interpret. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 9:21 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
He has argued cases in front of the California Supreme Court, and for nearly 40 years has fought day in and day out for the rights of injured workers. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:36 am by Dan Bressler
The California bar task force recognizes that entrepreneurial lawyers should be the ones leading innovation. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
The short concurrence from Judge White is worth noting because she rejects a per se rule that someone barred from membership cannot suffer an injury, agreeing only that in this case the plaintiff failed to allege an injury. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 3d 515, 525, where the court held that a bar was entitled to exclude the plaintiff because he had recently filed a small claims action against it. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 5:00 pm by Alysha Stein-Manes
Over the last several years, the California Courts of Appeal have addressed questions regarding the California State Teachers’ Retirement System’s (CalSTRS) ability to collect overpayments of monthly retirement benefits paid to retirees because of, among other things, miscalculations of the retirees’ compensation earnable. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Richard Hunt
Fee sharing between an attorney and non-attorney is forbidden by the ethical rules of most states so it is not surprising that Dinan’s sharing of fees with Johnson drew the judge’s ire although enforcing state bar ethics rules is usually not the job of federal judges. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 10:24 am by Bob Ambrogi
This Utah report comes on the heels of recommendations by a State Bar of California task force to make sweeping changes in the lawyer regulatory structure in that state. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm by Amy Howe
The battle over immigration through the southern border of the United States came to the Supreme Court today. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 11:09 am by Legal Profession Prof
The California Supreme Court disbarred an attorney for crimes described by the State Bar Court Hearing Department Beginning in or about June 2011, Respondent, with three non-attorneys, began operating a law office that was initially known as “Prudential Law Group”... [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
After the Khroma line was released, Boldface sought a declaratory judgment in California federal court that Boldface did not infringe the KROMA trademark. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “The court found that Shimko violated a disciplinary rule that generally bars lawyers from using information relating to the representation of a former client to the disadvantage of the former client. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CEConvener:… [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: Why oh why did the Supreme Court decline to incorporate the Fourteenth Amendment against the states? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Eric Swalwell of California and former Colorado Gov. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:04 am by Alisha Kormondy
  California courts have interpreted this to require proof the disability was a substantial motivating factor behind the discrimination, rather than simply a motivating factor. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:04 am by Alisha Kormondy
  California courts have interpreted this to require proof the disability was a substantial motivating factor behind the discrimination, rather than simply a motivating factor. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:19 am by Dan Harris
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Reproduced with permission of Continuing Education of the BarCalifornia (CEB). [read post]