Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 6,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:56 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In Peckingham v North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court in its spring 2017 session unanimously set aside a statute providing that registered sex offenders may not access social media sites. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943), and Korematsu v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am
Garre, a former United States Solicitor General now representing the University of Texas, as a kind of reductio ad absurdum. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:31 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am
Union members are in the minority. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
IMAGE: The United States Capitol (via Getty Images) The post The House Closed a Key Loophole in Court-Martial Appeals; Will the Senate Follow? [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:58 am
Diane Webber, a British lawyer who recently did a lengthy study of detention law in a variety of countries, writes in with the following account of the European Court of Human Rights decision earlier this month in Hassan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
United States and ex parte Endo. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The Constitutional Right to Seek an Abortion: From Roe to Casey Before the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth' (Masson… [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
ANDERSON, Appellee. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Relocation of children -- Error to enter temporary order granting husband permission to have parties' minor children relocate with him to foreign state where there was no competent, substantial evidence which would support a finding that relocation was in children's best interestSANDRA LEE ALBANESE, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has already ruled that at least some asset forfeitures are covered by the Clause in the 1998 case of United States v. [read post]
