Search for: "WEEKLY v. STATE"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 3,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
From Bixler v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 11:13 am
S.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 6:52 am
Additional Resources: Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
Nigeria It is reported that Nigerian singer, 2Face Idibia has filed a N100 million lawsuit against a local soft-sell magazine, Icon Weekly, for libel. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Petersen v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
” Boozer v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:12 am
Jones - As with most court decisions, the facts of US. v Jones are critical in understanding the importance and the reach of the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
Or simply state there's a §109(e) exclusion. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
In particular, a scheme whereby a prisoner was compelled to pay half the money received from his family to the State was held to fall within the wide margin of appreciation afforded to states under A1P1 (Laduna v Slovakia, ECtHR, judgment of 13 December 2011) [46]. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:05 am
State ex Pressware Int’l., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Wetzel v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
One thing which also may be guaranteed is that there will be unintended effects – as socio-legal scholars describe it, there will be a gap between the intended effects of the formal law and everyday life.In R(CPAG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin), CPAG challenged two of the new rules – relating to the maximum weekly caps, and the reduction of the maximum size in accommodation eligible for hb (from five to four… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
One thing which also may be guaranteed is that there will be unintended effects – as socio-legal scholars describe it, there will be a gap between the intended effects of the formal law and everyday life.In R(CPAG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin), CPAG challenged two of the new rules – relating to the maximum weekly caps, and the reduction of the maximum size in accommodation eligible for hb (from five to four… [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 9:03 am
Traylor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 10:00 pm
Denezpi v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
See Allart v. [read post]
