Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 4,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 4:15 am
JUROCK, 2013 BCCA 4 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
Does anyone know? [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:09 pm
Justice Donald wrote at paragraph 41:[41] Granting an automatic exemption to recipients of employment or disability insurance suggests a more generous approach than was previously taken. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
815 ILCS 505/1(c). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
SOCAN, which held that the internet delivery of a permanent copy of a video game containing musical works is not a “communication” under s. 3(1)(f) of the Copyright Act.The “communication” right was precisely the basis for the ringtone tariff in the first place. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
It was in 2004 when he committed the errors at issue, the fact he subsequently became certified does not help the government. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Maharishi challenged the Board of Appeal’s decision with four pleas, respectively concerning Article 7(1)(a) and 75, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(3) of the CTM Regulation. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:57 am
(#41) “Was there damage to the vehicle [the accident victim was] occupying or struck by? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The language of FCA § 413(1)(c)(7) does not command any formula with respect to apportionment of private school tuition (to the same effect, see D.R.L. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45–46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957).Arters, 2013 WL 308768, at *1.Umm…. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
(“objects being conveyed are subject to being caught in the gaps between the links”), solved by Habasit using an identical solution, see col. 14, lines 38-41 of Thompson, Jr. et al. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The European Court refers to “une marge d’appréciation particulièrement importante” ([41]). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
No. 41 (Ont. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Back on 1 April 1996, when the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market still smelled of new paint and no-one yet realised how few business flights landed at Alicante, Anheuser-Busch applied to register four Community trade marks (CTMs). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:42 am
The company does not anticipate any significant financial impact as a result of this action. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 7:29 pm
Articles 1-10 focus on general principles and provisions. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Cir. 2004).AndThe decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11-20,36, 39-41, and 43-48 is AFFIRMED.This decision contains several new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37C.F.R. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:18 am
RFC CDO 2006-1 Ltd., Case No. 4:11-cv-664, Doc. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Following is a “boardworthy” sample of big developments from 2012 that should give some boards and C-suites (and you know who you are) pause: 1. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:23 am
Fink that (1) applicant "is seeking to register multiple marks, as displayed in its specimens," and (2) applicant’s mark differs in the drawing and the specimen," both in violation of Sections 1 and 45 of the Trademark Act. [read post]
