Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2022, 6:37 am
As a noun meaning wet mud or slime, "ooze" goes back to early Old English. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:58 am
Decision at point 7 (English translation). [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:14 am
This question has been indirectly considered in two recent English cases: Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc.The background to both cases is different.Skyscape supplies cloud computer services to organisations within the UK public sector. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
Mr Justice Birss observed in Illumina v MGI that a limiting definition of a feature in the description, limits the scope of the claim. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:19 pm
This Kat learns that the English language versions of Advocate General Bot’s Opinions in Cases C-146/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union were finally made publicly available last Thursday. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:15 am
As the Supreme Court unanimously recognized in Brown v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1615, 1619 (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:09 am
Olswang LLP acted for the Interveners, English PEN, Article 19 and Index on Censorship, at the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:11 am
(Quoting Gaus v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
On 20 April 2021, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Corbyn v Millet [2020] EWHC 1848. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
Colman J held that the Indian injunction could not be enforced in England either under the common law or the English enforcement legislation, and that it did not create a right to an English anti-suit injunction either: Airbus v Patel [1996] ILPr 465. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am
In an opinion by Justice Breyer, the Supreme Court reversed, 9-0, holding that ordinary English grammar suggests that the term "knowingly" applies to all of the statutory elements. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 4:02 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:13 pm
The defendant was the owner of the younger German word device trade mark registration for the word element "PUDEL" (English: poodle) and the outline of a jumping poodle, which had been registered since early 2006 for clothing and t-shirts, among other goods. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm
To Roberts, Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:12 am
” Grant v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:20 am
(quoting Garcia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
For that reason, English law could for these purposes supplant that of “Ruritania”. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:16 pm
Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
