Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 9,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
But, unfortunately, efficiency gains (reduced data volumes, increased processing speeds, economic use of screen space etc.) often serve as an excuse for circumventing Art. 52 EPC.Tomorrow the Munich I Regional Court will hold a first hearing in one of eight BlackBerry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
In addition to those ten Nokia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
¶23 (quoting Chidnese v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
First, as to the bad news: Boxed in by the United States Supreme Court's decisions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements, including in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 7:13 am
While this is good for the state and the workers and there families, this vast financial gain for the state often comes at a cost for some workers whose employers are not will to follow the law an pay their workers the benefits and wages they have earned. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
” Because, said the Second Circuit panel, the DOJ reasonably concluded that § 1373 falls within the universe of these “other applicable laws” Congress had in mind, it does not violate separation of powers for DOJ to use the grants to gain cooperation from states. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court dismissed his petition and Solano appealed.The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, noting that Solano, in his brief, conceded that notwithstanding the retirement disability allowance determination made by the State Comptroller, the City is entitled to make a separate determination as to whether he was permanently disabled as a result of an injury incurred in the performance of his duties as a firefighter, citing Cook v City of Utica, 88 NY2d… [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
14 May 2008, 11:20 am
Aventis Pharma v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:54 pm
The end result in Flannery v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm
In reaching that ruling, the Court examined its decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 11:23 am
The cases are Brewer v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
There were some SEP issues in Apple v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
” * Kassa v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
Intel Corp. v Advanced Micro Devices. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The case in question is Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2015] EWCA Civ 54, a decision of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, last Friday. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:42 am
A sharply divided Supreme Court ruled today (5-4) in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
I cannot imagine that its proposed amendments would in fact gain the support of the constitutionally-required three-quarters of the states (which means, further, the support of at least 75 separate legislative houses in the same 38 states, assuming that one of them is Nebraska). [read post]
