Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 70,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
"Likelihood of confusion: The Board noted that this case was "a bit unusual in that neither party in its brief actually points to evidence or arguments regarding the du Pont factors. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:15 pm
Mark Tushnet, the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and author of I Dissent: Great Opposing Opinions in Landmark Supreme Court Cases (Beacon Press, 2008) will visit Cleveland-Marshall as one of the 2008-2009 Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Visiting Scholars. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
I finally read the CCB's written opinion that Mark Handelman was kind enough to send me. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:24 am
The case involved the opposition filed by Guess? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm
An example of the problem:One of the most blatant examples of improper confidentiality markings involves case citations and parentheticals describing the cited cases which are used to support the proposition that “parol evidence should have been exam- ined to resolve the ambiguity and determine the intent of the parties. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 12:08 pm
I'll be posting an entire range of the video's here at the Settlement Channel, but I thought I'd kick it off with the 9 minute video podcast of Civil Action Attorney Jan Schlichtmann and myself, Mark Wahlstrom, discussing his new Civil Action Center, but more importantly the Procrit case that will be major news in the coming weeks, and the innovative trust concept that might potentially reshape how Mass Tort cases are handled in the future. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 5:37 am
Yet a recent case in El Cajon serves as a warning about nursing home sexual abuse and the serious risks that seniors face. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 5:37 am
Yet a recent case in El Cajon serves as a warning about nursing home sexual abuse and the serious risks that seniors face. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:15 pm
In the meantime – you may find this podcast I did with Mark Stephens, then Assange’s lawyer, of interest for context and how the case began. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
Prior New York cases often cited as "famous marks doctrine" cases were based on misappropriation - it's unfair to appropriate the results of the skill, expenditures and labor of a competitor. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:59 am
The issues The case concerned the following issues: Whether the disputed Big Horn signs are at least similar to the Red Bull trade marks, are used on similar goods and give rise to a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public within the meaning of Article 9(2)(b). [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
© Mark Pearson 2012 This post originally appeared on the Journlaw blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:08 pm
On May 11, 2022, the Justice Department issued a subpoena to FPOTUS for any records in his possession with classified markings. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:50 am
TRAC Immigration reports that the Immigration Court's active backlog of cases just passed the million case mark. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 12:00 pm
But my experience of teaching and marking case note writing, and informal discussions with students, indicate that they have consistently struggled with the case brief assessment – particularly with the identification and explanation of the holding. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:53 pm
Generally, costs in trade mark proceedings are awarded pursuant to Schedule 8 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth). [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:53 pm
Generally, costs in trade mark proceedings are awarded pursuant to Schedule 8 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth). [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:53 pm
Generally, costs in trade mark proceedings are awarded pursuant to Schedule 8 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth). [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:53 pm
Generally, costs in trade mark proceedings are awarded pursuant to Schedule 8 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:06 am
What could be more exciting than a case involving insurance company marks? [read post]
