Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 2961 - 2980 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
The CSSA provides for “a precisely articulated, three-step method for determining child support” awards in both Family Court and Supreme Court. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:15 am by Steve McConnell
 But today we will conduct a mortality and morbidity meeting on the case of Marcum v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
We will explore some examples, but first let us consider what Justice O’Connor said about Bush v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:53 am by Schachtman
  Reviewing the relied upon studies for whether they ruled out chance, bias, and confounding, was precisely what the Supreme Court did in General Electric v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:38 am by Susan Brenner
 . . .That is precisely what occurred in Munoz. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Shiffrin: that’s just a standard antidiscrimination law. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
This standard is discretionary in  nature and is governed by general equitable principles. (4) In the circumstances of this case, an award of all necessary expenses would be "clearly inappropriate." [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 This is an application of the “narrow standard” of contributory liability articulated in Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:01 am by Susan Brenner
G.C. was given a warning for using profanity in class. . . . [read post]