Search for: "People v. Bounds" Results 2961 - 2980 of 3,575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 7:13 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
But, as I have seen and heard from various people, there are many challenges in achieving the object behind the Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADR) like “Arbitration” under “Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996”. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:51 am by Durga Rao
But, as I have seen and heard from various people, there are many challenges in achieving the object behind the Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADR) like “Arbitration” under “Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996”. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
  At any rate, this is sort of a reverse Ice-Foster argument; until Peoples is overruled, lower courts are bound to follow it. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
The People) US Trade Marks & Domain Names Lessons in smart trademark management: Free licensing of the mark from Twitter (Techdirt) [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm by charonqc
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:55 am by Guest Blogger
None of the legal arguments employed in Perry v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Vesting health insurance rightsHandy v Schoharie County, Appellate Division 244 A.D.2d 842In the Handy case, the Appellate Division said a legislative body may adopt of a resolution that alters a retiree's health insurance benefits and that such a change can be legally applied to people who retired prior to the vote to change benefits.In December 1995, the Schoharie County Board of Supervisors adopted three motions changing its policy with respect to its providing County… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:12 pm by Steve McConnell
"Off-label" makes one think of "out-of-bounds. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:44 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Congress, however, has not written the statute that way, and this Court is bound to apply the law as it is written. [read post]