Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 2961 - 2980 of 31,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 4:14 am by Dianne Saxe
It depends on the person, on the carpet and on how you look after it. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm by Nancy Morawetz
They also have important implications for how we think about the people who are the litigants in these cases and what kind of treatment they receive while they pursue their claims. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton: Documents and Commentary 811 (Julius Goebel ed. 1981) (reprinting Alexander Hamilton’s defense argument in People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” iii) How can court performance (or that of the Chief Justice) be measured? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
  It'll get people drunk faster and also sleaze California out of taxes. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
Nothing more, no matter how one tries to manipulate the issue. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case at bar, the criminal court assumes the most stringent standard in People v Vilardi, that is, the “reasonable possibility” standard to apply. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:20 pm
"  Maybe it's a little bit confusing because of the whole "unlawful" part of "unlawful detainer," but still, it's a civil case, not a criminal one, so we don't find people "guilty" or not guilty. [read post]