Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 2961 - 2980 of 6,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 7:49 am by WSLL
Castle of Davis and Cannon, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Joy
Police say staff 97 per cent fully vaccinatedThe Supreme Court will take up the most important abortion case in 30 years as it considers a state's request to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm by Mike
University of California Davis Board of Trustees (9th Cir. 2000)]; Yanowitz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Such a claim could be viable under Title VII and Section 1981 if properly pleaded and proven, the court explained, denying the employer’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile (Davis v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 12:44 pm
. * Dealing with Children as Witnesses* New Developments in the Right to Confront Witnesses: Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:16 pm
Joe Mysak at Bloomberg has this article about the potential impact of Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:19 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This new law was at issue in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division opinion styled, Sucheta Vyas and Davis Vyas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:16 am by Walter Olson
And at Cato’s Constitution Day on September 17 I’ll be discussing my forthcoming piece on EEOC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Mark Walsh
Breyer also announced the judgment and delivered a plurality opinion yesterday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]