Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
The first was the increasing utility of the Global Magnitsky Act that effectively permits a refined and targeted sanctions strategy akin to the possibilities of targeted killings made possible by refinements in drone and related technologies. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:27 pm
The desultory argument in Rimini Street v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 12:52 pm
Luck, having formerly served on the 3rd District Court of Appeal, located in our neck of the woods, while the fourth, Justice Alan Lawson, is a Rick Scott appointee.) [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision, pursuant to its 1998 holding in Atkinson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
Case Law Developments There have been some interesting developments since my December 11, 2018 post on the First Appellate District Court of Appeal’s grant of rehearing of its October 23, 2018 published opinion in Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am
” Cheney v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:15 am
V. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Phillips 66 Company: Short and SweetA three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling in favor of Phillips 66. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:10 am
“That practice,” the court reasoned, “effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Section II examines the first question, the admissibility of comparable sales that occur after a taking. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 8:46 am
Of judicial notice:Although a district court may consider judicially noticeable matters outside the pleadings without convertinga Rule 12(b)(6) motion into one for summary judgment, seeJackson v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Defendant Has No First Amendment Right to Wear "Black Lives Matter" T-Shirt at Trial
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm
First Judicial District Court, 303 F.3d 959, 966 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding courthouses are nonpublic forums); Sefick v. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
The district court rejected the plaintiffs’ plea. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
The FDCPA provides that an action under the statute “may be brought in any appropriate United States District Court … within one year from the date on which the violation occurs. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
” Citing a book on language and the law, she explained that Chinese philosopher Confucius: “When asked what he would do first if i [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
First, it recognizes the power of the government to take private property for public use. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
DO JUDICIAL CHALLENGES TO TAKINGS STILL EXIST? [read post]