Search for: "US Inventor" Results 2961 - 2980 of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 8:41 am
James (Jim) Orr, a partner in my firm, Heygood, Orr, Reyes, Pearson & Bartolomei, is a frequent guest and contributor to the Legal Broadcast Network, a website that uses blogging, video and audio podcasting to provide commentary for attorneys. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 3:24 am
  I have given Patent-it-Yourself to a number of clients, including corporate counsel and inventors. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by tom
The life of a patent used to be measured from the date the patent issued. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 3:24 am
  I have given Patent-it-Yourself to a number of clients, including corporate counsel and inventors. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:16 pm
In the realm of United States patent law, the answer to this is a strong NO; the true inventor must be named. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 2:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Then there are patents, which cover ‘new and useful inventions, manufactures, compositions of matter and processes reduced to practice by inventors’ with ‘rigorous requirements of subject matter, novelty, utility and non-obviousness’. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:55 pm
" Despite using the JP '199 application for priority, the '507 patent's specification jettisoned the Crystal B disclosure and used broader claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“If a reference disclo- sure has the same purpose as the claimed invention, the reference relates to the same problem, and that fact supports use of that reference in an obviousness rejec- tion. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 9:46 am by Joshua Drexler
Generally, an invention belongs to the inventor, and the fact that the inventor is an employee does not mean the employer necessarily has any rights to the invention. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
• How do the changes of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act alter the strategic use of post grant proceedings parallel to litigation? [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Since the applicants had used the wrong word, the PTO solicitor argued that the applicant waived their right to argue actual reduction to practice. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:03 pm by Justin McCabe
  And most, if not all, of us have had to have…the talk. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 4:50 am
The CAFC held that Rubinstein was a presumptive co-owner of the patent because he was an inventor of claims 2 and 3 (and was indeed listed as an inventor). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:48 pm by Ana
I would like to encourage inventors to look for commercial sense and strategic thinking when choosing a patent attorney. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:07 am by Adam Mossoff
The Sewing Machine War was not brought to an end by new federal laws, lawsuits by public interest organizations, or new regulations at the Patent Office, but rather by the patent owners exercising their rights of use and disposition in their property. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Defendant served their invalidity contentions in October 2015 and deposed the ‘327 patent’s inventor in January of 2016. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Defendant served their invalidity contentions in October 2015 and deposed the ‘327 patent’s inventor in January of 2016. [read post]