Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 2961 - 2980 of 13,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Iancu, No. 18-1285 (“Whether MPEP § 1207.04 violates patent applicants’ statutory right of appeal following a second rejection. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by David Dirr
  The case is a consolidation of three cases on appeal from the Ninth Circuit: Douglas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:14 am by Russell Beck
Back in January, I wrote about Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc. having sued a former executive who left for competitor Hostess Brands Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Richard S. Zackin
In a recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Lupyan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:43 am
The Second Circuit, United States Court of Appeals, says no.King's Gym Complex sued its commercial property insurer in federal court for business income loss coverage before actually filing a claim with the company. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:28 pm by Conor McEvily
petition of the day is: Title: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:41 am by Phil
The following is excerpted from a June 23, 2011 post at citybizlist of Boston: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Endoscopy Division, a subsidiary of Smith & Nephew plc (NYSE: SNN) (London Stock Exchange: SN) announced today that the jury in United States District Court in Oregon found in Smith & Nephew's favor that Arthrex, Inc., (Naples, Fla.) was guilty of infringing U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed certification of a Rule 23(b)(2) class encompassing all women currently employed by Wal-Mart in a variety of different positions with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief and back pay but remanded as to certification of the claims for punitive damages and the claims of putative class members who no longer worked at Wal-Mart when the complaint was filed. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:21 pm by Keith Reinfeld
  Rather, the United States Supreme Court and several circuit courts of appeal have determined that periods of time ranging from 7 to 10 minutes is considered de minimis. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:35 am by Frances Rogers
The Court of Appeals erroneously relied upon its earlier decision in the case of International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cisco Systems, Inc. cross-appeals the district court’s award of attorney fees and expenses. [read post]