Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit" Results 2961 - 2980 of 6,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2015, 7:19 am
Vance at the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from 1987 to 1988. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
  Yes, said the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Multi Time Machine, Inc., v Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Services, LLC (No.2:11-cv-09076-DDP-MAN, here) when it reversed the District Court’s summary judgment order in Amazon’s favour. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
"  See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:15 am
Universal WHEN: Tuesday, July 7 9 am WHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit James R. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had—on the authority of Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
Chappell, No. 12-55024 (Berzon with Pregerson and Wardlaw) --- In this companion case to Mitchell, argued before the same panel, the Ninth Circuit also vacated and remanded the dismissal of a California state prisoner's § 2254 habeas petition. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm by Steve Sady
The Ninth Circuit already held in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jason Starling
The plaintiffs then appealed to the Ninth Circuit, where they asked the appellate court to summarily affirm the trial court’s decision, which it did. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am by Florian Mueller
They'll argue that the Federal Circuit decision won't have weight because that appeals court was only in charge because patents used to be at issue in this case, but it had to apply Ninth Circuit copyright law and, as that camp claims, got it all wrong. [read post]