Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 3:24 am
United States, concluding that “this result doesn’t represent some new watershed in white collar crime or dramatic expansion of federal criminal jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Brice Petrides-Donahue & Associates, Inc., 473 N.W.2d 612, 619 (Iowa 1991) (citations and quotation marks omitted).Missouri:[P]unitive damages are remedial and a plaintiff has no vested right to such damages prior to the entry of judgment. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Brice Petrides-Donahue & Associates, Inc., 473 N.W.2d 612, 619 (Iowa 1991) (citations and quotation marks omitted).Missouri:[P]unitive damages are remedial and a plaintiff has no vested right to such damages prior to the entry of judgment. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
In Stauffer v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:40 am
In this long-running cancellation proceeding aimed at a registration for the mark COHIBA for cigars, the Board considered "the means available to cross-examine a declarant or affiant testimonial witness outside the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 12:10 am
That's the Ford v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am
ERISA lawyers will be watching this United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am
Voting in America is a precious right; eligibility is established in the United States Constitution, its amendments, by state laws and by various acts of Congress. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am
At Opinio Juris, William Dodge discusses Cardona v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:35 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
