Search for: "ABS-1 LLC"
Results 281 - 300
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
Janco, LLC, Opposition No. 91217243 (January 7, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:39 pm
Actavis Elizabeth LLC et al. 1:16-cv-00397; filed May 27, 2016 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Orexo AB; Orexo US, Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
The lawsuit was filed by VMG Salsoul LLC, current rightsholders of the 1976 song Love Break, which was performed by Salsoul Orchestra. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:12 pm
2:16-cv-01438-AB-SS). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
Hoey’s case, in November 2013 he executed a one-page document oddly entitled Assignment of Stock and/or Propriety Interests, purporting to assign to his wife, Wendy Hoey, in consideration of the terms of a concurrent Separation Agreement, his ownership interests in certain realty along with: his FIFTY (50%) percent interest in the LLC’s known as 1 SOUTH FOREST AVENUE, LLC, which owns the buildings known as 1 South Forrest… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
Hoey’s case, in November 2013 he executed a one-page document oddly entitled Assignment of Stock and/or Propriety Interests, purporting to assign to his wife, Wendy Hoey, in consideration of the terms of a concurrent Separation Agreement, his ownership interests in certain realty along with: his FIFTY (50%) percent interest in the LLC’s known as 1 SOUTH FOREST AVENUE, LLC, which owns the buildings known as 1 South Forrest… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
Hoey’s case, in November 2013 he executed a one-page document oddly entitled Assignment of Stock and/or Propriety Interests, purporting to assign to his wife, Wendy Hoey, in consideration of the terms of a concurrent Separation Agreement, his ownership interests in certain realty along with: his FIFTY (50%) percent interest in the LLC’s known as 1 SOUTH FOREST AVENUE, LLC, which owns the buildings known as 1 South Forrest… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She noted that the Commission’s focus falls in three areas: (1) cases where there has been a failure to safeguard customers’ information (citing the Commission’s administrative proceeding against R.T. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Aegis Defense Services, LLC, 976 F. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:49 pm
EMAC, LLC v County of Hanover, 2016 WL 164132 (VA 1/14/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception, Uncategorized [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm
”); Astrazeneca AB v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:24 pm
” AB 1720 follows in the same vein as legislation which became effective January 1, 2015. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
Disidual Clothing, LLC, Opposition No. 91212768 (March 28, 2015) [not precedential] [TTABlogged here]. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
(`SuperValu’), AB Acquisition, LLC (`AB Acquisition’), and New Albertson's Inc.'s (`Albertson's’) (collectively, `Defendants’) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint [Docket No. 33]. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Case number: 11-cv-02121 (United States District Court for the District of Colorado) Case filed: August 15, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 16, 2015 10/30/2015 1/28/2016 2015-116 In the Matter of UBS AG Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16891 Case filed: October 13, 2015 Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 13, 2015 10/30/2015 1/28/2016 2015-115 In the Matter of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Admi [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:17 pm
Certain activities were also described as being activities intrinsic to section 7704(d)(1)(E) in the proposed regulations. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
"The Board therefore found the application to be void ab initio because the mark was not in use in commerce prior to applicant Section 1(a) filing date.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: What I find confusing about this decision is that the Board treats the opposed mark as if it were a service mark for restaurant services, rather than a trademark for pizza. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:47 pm
The approval lapsed due to inactivity, so Sullivan Farms IV, LLC, successor-in-interest, sought and was granted approval in 2011. [read post]
Precedential No. 40: TTAB Refuses to Allow Witness to Change Testimony in HOLLYWOOD HOTEL Opposition
22 Dec 2015, 4:40 am
Hollywood Casino LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 10:43 pm
The parties to this appeal are two foreign limited liability companies: A Guy Named Moe, LLC (“Moe’s”), appellant, and Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC (“Chipotle”), appellee. [read post]
