Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2017, 3:26 am
However, Birss J granted Actavis leave to appeal his decision on EP 181 (only). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
Patent practitioners have been speculating in recent weeks about what the Actavis v Eli Lilly Supreme Court judgment means in practice and how that decision might be applied. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:31 am
Brian Corderyby Rachel Mumby Patent lawyers in the UK have spent the last three months pondering, debating and at times indulging in an element of despair (to put it mildly) about what might be the impact of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48 on issues of validity (see here). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 7:32 am
Adair reinforced the “very low” threshold for plausibility adopted by the English courts (see Carr J in Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294) – this was different to the “fair expectation of success” in the inventive step inquiry. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:59 pm
Nonetheless, the requirement of plausibility is still a “very low” threshold and different to the requirement of “fair expectation of success” in the inventive step inquiry - citing Actavis v Lilly[2015]. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 5:19 am
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-451-RGA (D.Del. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:30 am
Actavis was one of the most important antitrust cases of the modern era. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:40 am
INAUGURAL WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT LECTURE: "THE RULE OF REASON IN THE POST-ACTAVIS WORLD" Thursday, September 28, 2017 The Penn Club of New York 30 West 44th Street New York, New York Main Dining Room Breakfast - 9:30 a.m. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:29 am
However, both these conclusions were rejected by the Supreme Court which found direct infringement of the Italian designation of the patent by the Actavis variants. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:30 am
Actavis proposed the launch of competing products that used pemetrexed together with vitamin B12, but, instead of using the same active ingredient Actavis would've used a different, albeit similar combination (differing from the patent claims). [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 5:56 am
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-1309-GMS (consolidated) (D.Del. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:07 am
Filed in the First Judicial District Court for Santa Fe County [official website], the lawsuit claims that major opioid manufacturers, including Purdue Pharma, Johnson and Johnson, Endo Health Solutions, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Actavis [corporate websites], falsely represented and downplayed the highly addictive nature of the... [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
Actavis UK case in An Improved Improver? [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm
Actavis, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm
Actavis, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm
Actavis souhaite commercialiser des produits anticancéreux [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:43 am
Having been involved in the recent Actavis v Lilly Supreme Court case, and indeed some of the earlier leading decisions as well, Andrew will take participants through the history and implications of Actavis v Lilly and lead the debate: Actavis, interpretation and file wrapper – what do we do now? [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
. | Changes to the Singapore copyright system: an update on the recent public consultations | he diplomatic crisis of Qatar and Gulf Cooperation Council's IP | Bundesgerichtshof's landmark ruling to hook extra-territorial patent infringement in Germany | BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patent | Monday Miscellany | Sunday Surprises Photo credit: frankieleon [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
. | Changes to the Singapore copyright system: an update on the recent public consultations | he diplomatic crisis of Qatar and Gulf Cooperation Council's IP | Bundesgerichtshof's landmark ruling to hook extra-territorial patent infringement in Germany | BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patent | Monday Miscellany | Sunday SurprisesNever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent… [read post]
