Search for: "ADOPTION OF A MINOR (No. 2)."
Results 281 - 300
of 4,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies the Standard for Terminating Consensual Guardianships of Minors
9 Oct 2016, 9:35 am
The court’s decision, which announced the burdens to be applied to both prongs of the test, was a 3-2-2 decision, with Justice Wood writing the opinion of the court, Justice Baker writing a concurring opinion, and Justice Danielson writing a dissenting opinion. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:56 pm
Pillar 2 Analysis Another piece of analysis published last week concerns Pillar 2. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 6:06 am
One will hopefully recall that case was uncontested and the Court simply adopted the restrictive definition put forward by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada:[18] In order for s. 3(2)(b) to apply, the Organization must be collecting, using, or disclosing personal information for a journalistic purpose. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
Airman First Class Leonard pled guilty to knowingly receiving visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of clause (1) or (2) of Article 134. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
By December 2019, the UN General Assembly adopted a Resolution to form an Ad Hoc Committee (AHC) to draft the Convention. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:49 am
On February 2, 2021, Santa Rosa’s City Council adopted a newly revised local urgency ordinance, replacing the initial ordinance that was in place July 7, 2020, through December 31, 2020, and temporarily reinstating COVID-19-related paid sick leave for employees working within Santa Rosa city limits. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
In America, the doctrine of foreign equivalents functions this way: Even if 90% of people in the US don’t speak Ukrainian, and thus would see a Ukrainian word as inherently distinctive, because of a small minority a descriptive term won’t be protected as a TM. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 5:09 pm
Leveson 2 is a public inquiry. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
In New York, Shapiro v Ettenson kicked things off, holding that the majority members of an LLC validly adopted a post-formation operating agreement without the minority member’s consent. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:01 am
All infringements will need to carry at least a 2 year maximum prison sentence. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
The meaning as it relates to particular persons may vary from time to time and must be determined according to the particular purposes of, and matter involved in, any proceeding. (24) “Issue” of an individual means descendant. (25) “Joint tenants with the right of survivorship” and “community property with the right of survivorship” includes co-owners of property held under circumstances that entitle one or more to the whole of the property on the death of the… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
The political process has been restructured along racial lines, and 2. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:58 am
” He also disagreed with the minority on the issue of adoption, disallowing non-heterosexual couples to jointly adopt. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Adopt “interactive” theory of fame. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
City of Philadelphia, the issue was whether Catholic adoption agencies which would not certify same-sex couples as eligible to adopt could be disqualified from a publicly funded program. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
B, who was adopted by R and J on November 29, 1983, was subsequently adopted on August 2, 1995 by Thomas, whom J married after R's death. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:32 pm
B, who was adopted by R and J on November 29, 1983, was subsequently adopted on August 2, 1995 by Thomas, whom J married after R's death. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm
While the court’s ruling today preserves Section 2 as a means to challenge discriminatory voting restrictions, the approach adopted by the court may well be used by courts to routinely reject challenges brought under Section 2 of the VRA — much like courts have done with constitutional challenges in the wake of Crawford. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
§2000e–2(a)(1) (disparate treatment), as well as policies or practices that are not intended to discriminate but in fact have a dispropor-tionately adverse effect on minorities, §2000e–2(k)(1)(A)(i) (disparateimpact). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
But Section 2 is the provision relevant to affirmative action. [read post]
