Search for: "ARMSTRONG v. MAY" Results 281 - 300 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 839 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir. 1988)(affirming grant of summary judgment on grounds that there was insufficient evidence that plaintiff’s colon cancer was caused by asbestos) Lee v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:16 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Naming Your Law FirmNew site launches as bencher election set to beginHeenan denies partners have gotten capital back - Law Times Family status rights protect maternity and parental leave, rules Ontario court  Lawyers ask Harper government why they don’t keep diversity stats about judgesCRA may have duty to warn taxpayers of tax schemes, Federal Court rulesVote to oppose ‘stand-your-ground’ laws passed unanimously by ABA House of DelegatesJustice Thomas’s… [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Clayborne Carson and Tenisha Armstrong have edited The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:35 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
"workplace cybertheft" lawsuit: Connecticut court may rule on document download by Toronto employee SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor declines request to block Obamacare contraception coverage The N.R.A.' [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Jareb Gleckel
By slipping a rational-basis inquiry into Casey’s undue-burden analysis, the Chief may be pulling a Marbury v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
The specific question that the justices had been asked to review in Armstrong v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Nash suggests that two words in Armstrong v. [read post]