Search for: "ARMSTRONG v. MAY"
Results 281 - 300
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
See Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:11 pm
Armstrong (1912), 32 N.Z.L.R. 409 at 425 (C.A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:59 pm
Today’s oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
The argument in Bond v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Bandukda Last week, in Till v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Stutzman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:33 am
Internet Patents Corporation v. eBags, Inc. et al, 4-12-cv-03385 (CAND August 28, 2013, Order) (Armstrong, J.). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
A força de nosso vínculo familiar será nosso grande diferencial na luta contra o desconhecido. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
A força de nosso vínculo familiar será nosso grande diferencial na luta contra o desconhecido. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 4:32 pm
Circuit specifically held in Armstrong v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:29 am
In this week’s case (Proctor-McLeod v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:24 am
In this week’s case (Currie v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
This embraces a pledge that “neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract” (Kirke La Shelle Co. v Armstrong Co., 263 N.Y. 79, 87). [read post]