Search for: "ARMSTRONG v. MAY" Results 281 - 300 of 553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionMarsico v Armstrong, 2013 NY Slip Op 07487, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §2510(2) provides that “Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:11 pm by Simon Chester
Armstrong (1912), 32 N.Z.L.R. 409 at 425 (C.A.). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:33 am by Docket Navigator
Internet Patents Corporation v. eBags, Inc. et al, 4-12-cv-03385 (CAND August 28, 2013, Order) (Armstrong, J.). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
 A força de nosso vínculo familiar será nosso grande diferencial na luta contra o desconhecido. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
 A força de nosso vínculo familiar será nosso grande diferencial na luta contra o desconhecido. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm by Giles Peaker
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm by Giles Peaker
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Peter Mahler
This embraces a pledge that “neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract” (Kirke La Shelle Co. v Armstrong Co., 263 N.Y. 79, 87). [read post]