Search for: "AS PTO, LLC"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 7:22 am
InvestPic LLC, 3-16-cv-02689 (TXND September 7, 2017, Order) (Kinkeade, USDJ) [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:15 am
Tinnus Enterprises LLC. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
For example, Snowflake Enterprises LLC has filed multiple trademark applications for offensive marks, examples of which can be found on the PTO’s website (a version of the N-word can be seen here and a swastika symbol can be seen here). [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:15 am
CaptionCall, LLC, (here) where a PTAB litigant is unable to include relevant evidence with its briefing, and must seek authorization from the Board to submit such as supplemental information, preserving such issues for appeal may take some additional effort. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
The PTO responds that theBoard did not find a likelihood of reverse confusion andthat its finding that the fame of the marks, the fifthDuPont factor, is neutral is supported by substantialevidence.We agree with the PTO that the Board did not find alikelihood of reverse confusion. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
Tam, … the case about the Asian-American rock band The Slants and their battle with the PTO to trademark their band name. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am
” In related news, some vanity license plates, according to some states, are offensive.https://patentlyo.com/patent/2017/06/matal-only-disparage.html * Update on Global Trademark Harmonization (2017-06-13) “Harmonization” is what broke US patent law (i.e. the AIA), so I fear trademark harmonization.https://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entry/update_on_global_trademark_harmonization * Michelle Lee Resigns as PTO Director (2017-06-07) As a result, we continue to recommend… [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
,LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
The Oregon law does not cover certain corporate directors, LLC members and LLP partners, along with sole proprietors (and the parents, spouses, and children of all of the above). [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
The Oregon law does not cover certain corporate directors, LLC members and LLP partners, along with sole proprietors (and the parents, spouses, and children of all of the above). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:00 am
See also, Celgard, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am
In Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am
In Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:02 am
The caption for the "intervenor" in EMERACHEM HOLDINGS, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 11:47 am
Supreme Court has limited its review to one question: “Whether inter partes review, an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the validity of existing patents, violates the Constitution by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:38 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, limited to the following question: Whether inter partes review—an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the... [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, limited to the following question: Whether inter partes review—an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the... [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm
CAC appeals the Board’s determinationthat the petitioner, Westlake Services, LLC(“Westlake”), was not estopped from maintaining CBMreview of those claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
