Search for: "ATES V. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 859
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 7:17 pm
The petition of the day is: Cardona v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In Bryant v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Judgment was handed down in respect of this subsequent hearing on 23 July 2014 in Coventry and others (Respondents) v Lawrence and another (Appellants) (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:24 pm
(Uncharitably, I have tended to consider such assertions as the ‘dog ate it’ defence. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:32 pm
Her constructive discharge and retaliation claims also advanced (Bryant v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
Canada In the case of Caron v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am
Lord Neuberger also mentioned a case to be heard by the Supreme Court in February 2015 which will consider whether the Access to Justice Act 1999 (repealed by the 2012 Act) is consistent with a defendant’s Article 6 rights, due to the provision for a 100% costs uplift and ATE premium being fully recoverable (Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor UKSC 2012/0076). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
The Court said that for a U.S. court to have jurisdiction to hear these ATS claims, the claims must “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 2:42 pm
Reeves v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:10 pm
We think Penn State’s patent would be found invalid under Alice v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
This case was brought under the ATS; the court looked to apply the decision from Kiobel[9] and stated that the citizenship, element as identified in CACI[10], was not relevant. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:55 pm
”As the Connecticut Supreme Court observed in the 1999 in the definitive case of Babcock v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
I'm in Austin, TX, for the next couple of days.My Aunt Gail died late last week after a protracted fight with cancer, so the extended family is here to both commiserate and celebrate - last night we drank some wine, ate some pasta, and did lots of hugging.Today we'll attend services, probably shed some tears, and then drink more wine, eat more pasta, and do more hugging.It's all so Italian...In between the family activities I'll be meeting with some Texas workers'… [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:42 pm
Moreover, the store manager himself ate food from the deli without paying for it. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., which effectively invalidated Chowdhury’s ATS legal theory. [read post]
