Search for: "Ackerman v Ackerman" Results 281 - 300 of 444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
In The Atlantic, Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres contend that the Court’s recent decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 4:12 pm
Bruce Ackerman and Sandy Levinson were important here. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
” As a narrow majority of the Supreme Court had explained in Garcia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Bruce Ackerman and others have suggested that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments may not have met Article V’s requirements, but attained legitimacy through other means.Similarly, it may mean that the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment can be legitimized through means other than Article V. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm by Max Weirauch
Partner Amy Ackerman has authored numerous appellate briefs on a variety of government law matters, including public meetings, public records, charter powers, and dependency law. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "Assuming that the legal malpractice causes of action accrued more than three years before this action was commenced (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 543; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872, 872; Alicanti v Bianco, 2 AD3d 373, 374), nevertheless, the complaint adequately alleged that the plaintiff was "left with the reasonable impression that [Levinson] was, in fact, actively addressing… [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, to the extent that the plaintiff’s action may be premature because, while the underlying action is pending, it cannot be determined whether the defendant’s alleged legal malpractice proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain damages (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 542-543; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1006; Stein Indus., Inc. v… [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:24 am by Ackerman Law Office
At Ackerman Law Office, we fight hard for victims’ rights workers compensation claims. [read post]