Search for: "Andrew R. v. ADES" Results 281 - 300 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
            The amendment was effective immediately and applies to all actions   pending on or after such effective date.Laws of 2018, Chapter 217 added CPLR 4540-a                Chapter 217 added CPLR 4540-a effective January 1, 2019 to eliminate the authentication burden often encountered by litigants who seek to introduce into evidence documents… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:17 am
Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm by Elina Saxena
Adding to concerns, a fight broke out in a Berlin refugee center. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:32 pm by Dan Flynn
On this coming Friday, Aug. 2, the federal court for New Mexico is going to be filled with lawyers as it seems the number of parties in Front Range Equine Rescue v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Related to literature on basing damages on R&D costs, which I review here.)Nicholson Price – The novelty requirement is not always aligned with social welfare, as illustrated by the biomedical field. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
FDA relies on statutory authority to regulate labeling/ads. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Perhaps the redundancy of the clause with due process explains why Reconstruction-era congressmen decided against adding a takings clause to the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, say the Los Angeles Times refuses to run an ad promoting the KKK, or promoting Antifa, or opposing vaccination. [read post]