Search for: "Application of Harms" Results 281 - 300 of 23,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
A defendant disputing the existence of serious harm may in an appropriate case, if the circumstances so warrant, issue a Part 24 summary judgment application or issue a Jameel application: the Jameel jurisdiction continuing to be available after the 2013 Act as before (albeit in reality likely only relatively rarely to be appropriately used). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am by Aviel Menter
A state court in Pennsylvania also denied a request for a similar injunction, finding that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated that the injunction was necessary to prevent them from suffering irreparable harm. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:36 pm by Mark Weidemaier
If a court is convinced of this in a particular case and can identify the parties’ actual intentions, there may be little harm in interpreting the contract in accordance with their intentions. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 5:02 am by Iowa Employment Law Letter
  Applicable laws Age discrimination is governed by both federal law and the laws in most states. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court found that the Petitioner established his prima facie case, and that there  was an insufficient factual basis to conclude by clear and convincing evidence that there was a grave risk of harm to the Children if they were returned to Mexico,. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:42 pm by Sarah E. Murphy, Esq.
Since the landmark BIA decision of Matter of Hranka in 1978, I-192 waivers and INA 212(d)(3) waivers have been adjudicated by consideration of three (3) factors: (1) The risk of harm to society if the applicant is admitted; (2) The seriousness of the applicant's immigration or criminal law violations; and (3) The nature of the applicant's reasons for wishing to enter the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:55 pm by Iain Hawthorn
The Dear CEO letter was not applicable to client money balances held within a tax efficient wrapper or under a collateral arrangement for margined transactions. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:21 am by Randy Wilson
MooSoft’s The Cleaner is a high performance application that protects, prevents and recovers your computer from malicious software (malware) attacks, including: trojans, spyware, adware and other harmful programs. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
This bar would be applicable even if they are harmed or permanently disfigured by the negligent medical care. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
The Texas Constitution provides that “[n]o person’s property shall be taken, damaged or destroyed for or applied to public use without adequate compensation being made. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:49 am by Arfaa Law Group
It is broadly understood that a party harmed by medical negligence must pursue claims against the health care provider that caused the alleged harm within the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:14 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
It is commonly understood that parties harmed due to someone else’s negligence must pursue their claim within the time frame set forth by the applicable statute of limitations, otherwise they waive the right to recover. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:05 am by Chijioke Okorie
According to the court, the 2nd Respondent’s actions in causing several takedown notices to be served on the Applicants constituted fault (or harm) against the Applicants. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:01 am by Dennis Crouch
The program is also built on a key insight – that some patent applicants are seriously harmed by delays in prosecution while others would prefer additional delay if it allows them to also defer cash outlays for the prosecution and maintenance costs. [read post]