Search for: "Barber v. Barber"
Results 281 - 300
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
Wakole v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:32 am
The Supreme Court is currently considering a case about this topic, Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:27 pm
Posted by Morin JacobIn Barber v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm
Prob C §16068; Salter v Lerner (2009) 176 CA4th 1184. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:39 am
Supreme Court Peacock, Re [2012] UKSC 3 (22 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Gul, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 280 (22 February 2012) Dowds v R [2012] EWCA Crim 281 (22 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Munin Navigation Company Ltd v Petrodel Resources Ltd ‘Munin Explorer’ [2012] EWCA Civ 136 (21 February 2012) The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul’s Churchyard camp representative) & Ors… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
As a result, there will be no appeal in the Thornton case and the finding of malice against Lynn Barber stands. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Dacre v Grant Despite Steve Coogan’s claim that “This is not, in case the press try to portray it that way, the Steve and Hugh show”, the dispute between Hugh Grant and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre bookended module one. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
R (S) v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
So, all of this was really bad practice and procedurally irregular – and the HHJ clearly has Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51 in mind.Southwark did not help themselves either. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
So, all of this was really bad practice and procedurally irregular – and the HHJ clearly has Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51 in mind.Southwark did not help themselves either. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
Barber, No. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:47 pm
-flagged F/V SIVA MOANA had fallen overboard while bringing in fishing gear. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
There is no requirement that the cause of the adjournment be the fault of one party, see Serban, at paras. 9-11. [43] Further guidance is found in the following excerpt from Master Barber’s decision in Tieu v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
There is no requirement that the cause of the adjournment be the fault of one party, see Serban, at paras. 9-11. [43] Further guidance is found in the following excerpt from Master Barber’s decision in Tieu v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
We thank Philip Barber of Zenith Chambers for providing us with a transcript of the judgment. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
We thank Philip Barber of Zenith Chambers for providing us with a transcript of the judgment. [read post]
