Search for: "Barr v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2020, 9:34 am
Barr, held that federal law has preempted state law. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:49 pm
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer's settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm
Barr Labs., Inc., 437 F.3d 1181, 1190–94 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
The ruling said that the United States must use Chinese prices to measure subsidies, even though the U.S. argued that such prices were distorted. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 1:11 pm
The NFA can be found in Title 26, Chapter 53, of the United States Code. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
Rather, "we've sued the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:51 pm
Write Barr and White: The federal courts have jurisdiction over "all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States," according to the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
United States: The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
The intervention in the Samantar case by the State Department is particularly significant because the United States only occasionally intervenes in litigation, and very rarely intervenes to claim that a defendant is not entitled to immunity. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:08 am
”“Flu causes millions of illnesses, hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and thousands or tens of thousands of deaths each year in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Barr v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
As a result, for such speech to be actionable as a violation of the MARPC, it must meet the high standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:55 am
Samantar eventually resettled in the United States and now lives in Virginia. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Mastromatteo Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0305p.06 2008/08/20 Barr v. [read post]
