Search for: "Bauer v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:48 pm by Larry
We know that because the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said so in Bauer Nike Hockey USA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:53 am by Joy Waltemath
A female African-American employee with a disciplinary history of confrontations and altercations with coworkers failed to show that her termination was the result of animus towards her because of her race or gender, ruled the Seventh Circuit (Johnson v Koppers, Inc, August 8, 2013, Bauer, W). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
The ruling came in three similar putative class actions that alleged Bauer Publishing Co., Hearst Communications, Inc, and Time, Inc., respectively, sold their customers’ personal information without permission. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am by Steve Satterfield
Bauer Publishing Co., Judge Steeh of the Eastern District denied a motion to dismiss by defendants Bauer, Hearst Communications and Time, Inc., which had argued that the plaintiffs’ lacked standing to sue in federal court and that the complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm by constitutional lawblogger
A divided Second Circuit panel upheld the conviction of Harold Turner in its opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
(John Bauer) As with any magical creature, there is some uncertainty about the trolls' characteristics, but they are usually thought to be creatures (companies) that hold a portfolio of patents, but do not commercially manufacture their inventions, focusing instead on asserting their patents (or threatening to) in courts, in order to secure lucrative licensing agreements. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:11 pm by Larry
That was in a case called Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]