Search for: "Bennett v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 2:38 pm
Bennett of the United States District Court in the Northern District of Iowa writes: “The time has come to recognize that summary judgment has become too expensive, too time-consuming for the parties and the judiciary, and too likely to unfairly deprive parties—usually plaintiffs—of their constitutional and statutory rights to trial by jury. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
However, as argued by defendants, plaintiffs submit an unsworn expert report from Bennett J. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
United States, which raises the question of whether Padilla v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
Bennett) Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:03 am
Today from the Ninth Circuit, we see an unusual split between Judges Kleinfeld and Callahan in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:56 am
Courtesy of federalevidence.com here is a link for a recent case dealing with GPS information: Ninth Circuit reverses an importation conviction based on the admission of testimony about GPS data which violated the best evidence rule; case demonstrated the application of the best evidence rule under FRE 1002, in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Dana Stuster updated us on the Hodeidah offensive in Yemen, the United States’ decision to withdraw from the U.N. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
The district court order stated that “the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation”; Levy’s post states that Ruddie is in the final stages of plea bargaining with the United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island; we understand that his obligations will extend to getting phony consent orders lifted in two dozen other cases besides those involving Myvesta. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
United States, 989 A.2d 1096 (D.C. 2010); People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
The Court also issued a per curiam decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
[1] Complaint at 1-2, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Consider State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:22 pm
This conclusion, Judge Jones noted, seems to "clash" with the Supreme Court's holding in Bennett v. [read post]
