Search for: "Black v. Davis"
Results 281 - 300
of 590
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 12:14 pm
Davis v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
Davis, 480 So.2d 625 (Fla.1985). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
And please note: Kim Davis never, at any point in her public statements, claimed any such power. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
The clerk is enforcing Kentucky law as written by its people represented through its legislature, not as five unelected jurists in black robes say by fiat that Kentucky law must be.The Supreme Court's majority opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
In 1825, Wayman v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:27 pm
Lawyers for the county clerk, Kim Davis, said she would seek a stay of the decision from the Sixth Circuit (the appellate court that was overruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
The Bakke story stretches back to Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 11:55 am
Concepcion and American Express v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:56 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:17 am
In a 5-4 decision, the majority held in Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am
In a ruling perhaps more noteworthy for an unusually testy exchange between two of the Justices in the majority, a five-to-four Supreme Court on Thursday sided with California in Davis v. [read post]
