Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
Benjamin C. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
The disclaimer therefore met the requirements of G 1/03 and was allowable. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
matter concerned. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:03 pm
All rights reserved by Carl C. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
However, after some time, C and G became concerned about how B was managing the estate. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:03 am
In particular, the court found the degree of visual and phonetic similarity to be low (due to the element ‘G’ in the G-maxx mark and a perceived different pronunciation) and took into account a market survey where 52% of the participants indicated not to be confused by the different marks.Concluding in the sense of no infringement, the court dismissed the appeal in its entirety.CommentReflecting on this case, this Katfriend disagrees with several principal findings of… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
George G. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
This is the (final) decision in the case that led to decision G 2/10 of the Enlarged Board (EBA)Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
The Defendants have not established that they are entitled to immunity as a matter of law under Section 9-30-6-6 against any civil claims Elliott might bring. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
The cases of Ambrose, G and M deal with various challenges that have arisen since the ruling in Cadder v HM Advocate. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:22 am
In her decision, Judge Huff granted Plaintiffs Rule 12(c) motions for judgment on the pleadings – ruling that all claims of the five asserted patents were invalid for claiming ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Facts: The trial court found that grounds for terminating respondents’ parental rights were established under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (c)(ii), (g), (j), and (l). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
While the SJC’s decision invites the Legislature to consider expanding the range of permissible damages to be awarded for such cases, it is clear that under current law, liability insurers face significant risk in their claims handling practices, particularly where the underlying matter involves clear liability and potential for significant damages. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 5:57 am
Board of Appeal's added matter analysisOn the substantive issues, the Board of Appeal found that the claims contained subject matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC). [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
”The Court struck down FDA’s determination and sent the matter back to the agency. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am
The foreign manager seeking immigrant classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(C) in Matter of G- was the Director, Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A) at a large multinational technology corporation. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
