Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 281 - 300 of 3,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2015, 6:00 am by Michael Risch
  Under proposed 285(c)(1)(G)(2)(A), an interested party is anyone with an interest, including employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:11 pm
See Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, Case Number: G 0002/06. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:18 am
In re V & C, LLC, Serial No. 86321427 (May 8, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos).Mere Descriptiveness: The Board has held that Italian is a common modern language for purposes of the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:56 am
Anyone can probate their own matter but sometimes a qualified and experienced probate attorney can be indispensable in order to save time, avoid mistakes and bring about the desired results. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm by Michael Froomkin
Perspectives de droit comparé (Céline Castets-Renard, Jessica Eynard, eds.) which should be forthcoming shortly. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:39 am by Neil Wilkof
The CJEU looked into the relationship between trade marks and mathematical shapes in the Gömböc case (C-237/19). [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 9:30 am by FM Librarian
This blog post by a former immigration judge provides some background on the lead-up to the decision.In the end, the AG overruled Matter of A-R-C-G- and vacated the BIA's decision on Matter of A-B-, effectively denying asylum protection to victims of domestic violence. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”  [2.10] Thus, although the appellant cited G 2/92 to support its view that this opinion exclusively concerned the prohibition of pursuing a non-unitary application in respect of subject-matter in respect of which no search fees had been paid and did not concern the examination procedure and subject-matter for which the search fees have been paid, the scope of G 2/92 extends – as explained supra – beyond the… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm by Alejandro Perez
Most recently, the First District Court of Appeal issued an April 17, 2012 opinion in a matter addressing this very issue in William G. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
By order dated June 28, 2017, the Supreme Court, Westchester County, transferred the proceeding to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g).In this proceeding, the petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the Justice Center, contending that it was not supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7804[g]). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Eleonora Rosati
Turning to distinctiveness, the speaker referred to decisions like those in C-265/09 P, C-84/16 P., T-610/21, T-458/21, R 1349/2022-5, and R 362/2023-4. [read post]