Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US " Results 281 - 300 of 7,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employers continue to incorporate the use of biometric information for several employee management purposes, such as in systems managing time keeping and security access that use fingerprints, handprints, or facial scans. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
He agreed to keep that information confidential and to not sell his shares until after the company made the information public. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:52 am by Julia Zebley
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Thursday voted 6-3 to affirm [opinion, PDF] the lower court in Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:10 am by Matthew Santiago
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [officia website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in favor of the prosecution in an insider trading case involving the gifting of confidential information to a relative. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:19 am
Certain information contained in personnel records may be redacted in complying with a Freedom of Information requestMatter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v City of Albany, 63 AD3d 1336The Albany Times Union [TU] reporter filed two requests under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law Article 6) with City of Albany seeking documents, including “gun tags,” related to the alleged use of official Albany Police Department… [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Grewal just handed down an order on motions for sanctions against Samsung and the Quinn Emanuel law firm over what I temporarily called the "Patentgate" affair involving allegations of improper use of highly confidential terms of Apple's license agreements with Nokia and other companies. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
” Communications with the media should also be used sparingly. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:33 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
On January 16, 2014, the English High Court of Justice issued reasons in Vidal-Hall v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:33 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
On January 16, 2014, the English High Court of Justice issued reasons in Vidal-Hall v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:43 am
A restrictive meaning of the expression would work in favour of Vulcan as the use of the information for a hostile takeover would be a breach, while an expansive meaning to include a hostile takeover would work in favour of Martin Marietta as the use of confidential information would then be for the purpose of the Transaction. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm by E. R. Wrigley
 This held that if the US intelligence services disclosed confidential information to the UK intelligence services (and vice versa) then the confidentially of the information was vested in the country which had disclosed the information and not the party who received it. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Vermont’s Prescription Confidentiality Law provides that, absent the prescriber’s consent, prescriber-identifying information may not be sold by pharmacies and similar entities, disclosed by those entities for marketing purposes, or used for marketing by pharmaceutical manufacturers. [read post]