Search for: "CUSTODY OF P D A"
Results 281 - 300
of 720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2008, 1:40 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
P. 52.8(c). [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:47 am
Salzburg, Attorney General; Terry L Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 1:40 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:47 am
Salzburg, Attorney General; Terry L Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
The court awarded defendant 196 actual days of custody credit plus 30 days of conduct credit for a total of 226 days of presentence custody credit. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 9:25 am
The extent to which a party deferred achieving their career goals; and p. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
App. 462, 225 P.3d 476 (2010), we considered and rejected the same argument. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
Out of the marriage, four children were born- A and B, twins who are aged three, C, aged two, and D, aged one. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
It held that the Family Court erred in dismissing the case for lack of personal jurisdiction given the provision of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act found at Domestic Relations Law 76(3), which provides that "[p]hysical presence of, or personal jurisdiction over, a party or a child is not necessary or sufficient to make a child custody determination. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 5:44 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
As readers have probably followed, the government has previously stated in its IP Crime Report that criminals who undermine the work of creators should face tough sentences [p.42]. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm
TONYA P. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm
P. 56(c)(2) advisory committee’s notes on 2010 amendments. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
(Delaney, supra, 20 Cal.4th at p. 31.) [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm
App. 787, 243 P.3d 941 (2010). [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Mariana D. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am
Under Washington Revised Code § 46.55.113(2)(b) and (d), impoundment is authorized when an officer finds a vehicle unattended on the highway where it jeopardizes public safety or when an officer arrests the driver and takes him into custody. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:02 pm
The ground for relief from the automatic stay to pursue equitable distribution set forth in 11 U.S.C. 362(d) is “for cause”, which the bankruptcy judge decides in his or her discretion. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm
§362(d) is “for cause”, which the bankruptcy judge decides in his or her discretion. [read post]
