Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 281 - 300
of 26,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Claimant [Plaintiff] had been employed by the New York City Transit Authority [NYCTA] for 33 years. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Claimant [Plaintiff] had been employed by the New York City Transit Authority [NYCTA] for 33 years. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
The Workers' Compensation Board [Board] rejected the employer's [Employer] claim the there were procedural errors in its employee's [Claimant] claims for benefits and said that the Board would exercise its discretion to grant review of the application filed by the Claimant in consideration of "Claimant's substantial completion of question number 13 on the application for workers' compensation benefits form. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
The Workers' Compensation Board [Board] rejected the employer's [Employer] claim the there were procedural errors in its employee's [Claimant] claims for benefits and said that the Board would exercise its discretion to grant review of the application filed by the Claimant in consideration of "Claimant's substantial completion of question number 13 on the application for workers' compensation benefits form. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am
The employee who came forward and spoke to the press about these allegations said she is now facing retaliation for the agency for speaking about internal issues and about what was on claimant’s applications. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Lachaux itself did not involve a corporate claimant and until it reached the Supreme Court the case focussed exclusively on s.1(1), the serious harm test that applies to all claimants. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division reversed a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board which denied the claimant's [Claimant] request to reopen or rehear a prior decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division reversed a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board which denied the claimant's [Claimant] request to reopen or rehear a prior decision. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Notably, said the court, no evidence was introduced to contradict Claimant’s testimony. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
" In 2016, the Claimant's former employer's workers' compensation carrier reopened the case, raising the issue of whether Claimant violated WCL §114-a. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
" In 2016, the Claimant's former employer's workers' compensation carrier reopened the case, raising the issue of whether Claimant violated WCL §114-a. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 9:19 am
A Claimant’s Guide appeared first on Bryant Legal Group PC. [read post]
10 May 2023, 8:56 am
Wendy’s Trucking, LLC et al. , March 8, 2023, Fla. 2nd District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Big Changes to Law Will Impact Florida Personal Injury Lawsuit Claimants, April 3, 2023, South Florida Injury Lawyer Blog [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:53 am
“Oil giant BP’s $20bn (£13bn) fund to compensate those hit by the Gulf of Mexico spill has been frozen, following a court order that all claimants must share the cost of the legal team leading the action over the disaster – whether or not they pursued their claim through the courts. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:19 pm
The judge issued a worker’s compensation order denying the claimant’s request for authorization. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 10:09 am
Most of this “paper” consists of the claimant’s medical records and attending physician statements from the claimant’s physicians. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:37 am
Over time, your joints, including those in your spine, start to […] The post Degenerative Disc Disease and Disability Insurance: A Claimant’s Guide appeared first on Bryant Legal Group PC. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:45 am
Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2009] EWHC 2908 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 334 "The United Kingdom’s thin capitalisation ('thin cap') provisions which remained in force, in a potentially discriminatory form, until 2004 were not proportionate to achieve the purpose of preventing abusive tax avoidance because they did not [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant’s identity was not an irrelevant feature of this particular story. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:06 am
He submitted that the court should accept the claimant’s evidence and also accept the the defendant was acting in bad faith: after the claimant’s defensive tweets she knew that the First Tweet was false. [read post]
