Search for: "Clark v. Wells"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Its strategy, as well as its work in general, are guided by core principles of protection of individuals’ personal data and development of a common data protection culture, which serves as an inspiration and model globally. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:08 am
See Wengui v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
In Trott v Trott, 2020 WL 4926336 (E.D. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
“Especially now, as a global pandemic poses widespread health risks, guaranteeing that government officials at both the federal and state levels have flexibility to address the nutritional needs of residents and ensure their well-being through programs like SNAP, is essential,” Chief District Judge Beryl A. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
Two of these opinions, Swicegood and Clark, I believe the appellate courts botched (two of the five justices agree with me on Clark). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Well the examiner thought consumers would see the mark as a promotional statement, the function of which was to inform consumers that those goods were offered in order to express love and affection. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
Geico decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court should be viewed broadly as well as those other decisions that have indicated that the decision should be interpreted narrowly. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
This proposition is - again - uncontroversial in light of Douglas v Hello!. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am
Stanley v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 1458 A second appeal on the vexed issue of s.204 appeals of late or ‘out of time’ s.202 reviews. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:13 pm
Clarke, 1 Dall. 354, 1 L. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
Wecht decried what he saw as the other justices of the court “upending … well-established precedent” and supplanting its own judgment over that of the Legislature in this area of the law.The case of Gallagher v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Clarke. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
[There would be an interpretive question about Bolling v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
Justice Dirk Sandefur's majority opinion (jointed by Justices Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker, and Ingrid Gustafson) in State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:46 am
This is demonstrated by the number of lawyers across all parties who have served as MPs – Lloyd George, Herbert Asquith, Clement Atlee, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Ken Clarke, Dominc Grieve to name just a few. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
The court’s reasoning began with the well-known tripartite test for breach of confidence found in the English case of Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41, namely (as paraphrased by the court in LVM) that:(a) “the information must possess the quality of confidentiality;(b) the information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence; and (c) there must have been some unauthorised use of that information to the… [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
Milan v. [read post]
