Search for: "Commonwealth v. Wells, B." Results 281 - 300 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
For, the Legislature has both the right and the authority to select the methods to be used in effectuating its goals, as well as to choose the goals themselves.Sheehy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, determinations of whether an alien faces a “well-founded fear of prosecution” based on religion unnecessarily entangles the government in deciding the contours of spiritual doctrines. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
As Bob Ambrogi reports, on February 19, 2013, Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Peter Lauriat held a hearing in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
Some courts heroically resisted the pro-compensation Zeitgeist, usually on case-specific evidentiary issues.[8] In New York, judges seem to be well aware that post hoc ergo propter hoc is a fallacy. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
§§ 233(b), (c)(1) exclusion of "indecent" communications). [7] Pacific Gas & Elec. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Depending upon how the statute is interpreted, this setup appears to create a presumption of injunctive relief – a stark difference from contemporary patent law doctrine under eBay v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
  Judge Sweet dismissed that aspect of the fraud claims on the grounds that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) requires that allegations of fraud be pleaded with specificity and that the plaintiff must provide a statement of facts upon which the belief of the existence of fraud is founded. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
” The Fehmarn was a 1957 English decision and may well reflect the mood of the courts in that era where party autonomy was still emerging. [read post]