Search for: "Connecticut v. Massachusetts" Results 281 - 300 of 723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm by Joel O'Malley
Sep. 4, 2015), decided under Connecticut and Massachusetts law, but applying legal concepts that generally hold outside of those states. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Town of Durham, Connecticut, 15-631, and Kakarala v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Caetano’s petition and our amicus brief argued that there was a split between the reasoning of this decision and the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 3:07 am by Immigration Prof
Amicus Brief of the States of Washington, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New... [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
 If and when adopted by Pennsylvania and Connecticut, where RULLCA legislation already has been introduced, New York will be surrounded by RULLCA jurisdictions with the exception of Massachusetts. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
 If and when adopted by Pennsylvania and Connecticut, where RULLCA legislation already has been introduced, New York will be surrounded by RULLCA jurisdictions with the exception of Massachusetts. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
 If and when adopted by Pennsylvania and Connecticut, where RULLCA legislation already has been introduced, New York will be surrounded by RULLCA jurisdictions with the exception of Massachusetts. [read post]
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania recognize the concepts of employee choice and forfeiture-for-competition, but apply them in conjunction with a traditional reasonableness analysis. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:40 am by Lauri F. Rasnick
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania recognize the concepts of employee choice and forfeiture-for-competition, but apply them in conjunction with a traditional reasonableness analysis. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 194 (MA App., Feb. 25, 2016), a Massachusetts state appeals court reversed a trial court's dismissal of a RLUIPA claim by a Nation of Islam inmate challenging limits on his access to  use classroom space to pray and study throughout the week.In Hays v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some grand IP ideas popped up in Neil's mind, after General Electric company to move its headquarters from the New York suburbs in Fairfield, Connecticut to Boston, in the near-by state of Massachusetts. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]