Search for: "Cooper v. High" Results 281 - 300 of 2,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 10:53 am
With Judge Thomas as the author.This is a sufficiently high-profile opinion that I need not say much about it, and the whole thing's worth reading anyway. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:29 am by David Oscar Markus
The reason: Rothstein is hoping to reduce his 50-year prison sentence by continuing to cooperate with authorities. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Of the 10 cases in which the claimant succeeded in 2011, there were 4 against Mr Kordowksi, and 3 assessments of damages in the absence of the defendant (Al-Amoudi v Kifle and Cooper v Turrell) or where the defendant was in person (Clynes v O’Connor). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by New York Criminal Defense
In People v McCullough, the case pending at the Court of Appeals, the issue will be whether a cooperating witness’s testimony provided adequate corroboration to the eyewitness testimony.In light of these cases, if you have a case that turns on identification evidence, you should certainly explore the possibility of making a motion to introduce expert testimony. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by Danielle Wild
In People v McCullough, the case pending at the Court of Appeals, the issue will be whether a cooperating witness’s testimony provided adequate corroboration to the eyewitness testimony.In light of these cases, if you have a case that turns on identification evidence, you should certainly explore the possibility of making a motion to introduce expert testimony. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am by Emily Dai
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit proceedings for the case Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:52 am by nflatow
Cooper, state appellate defender Valerie Newman said it was the justices’ hostility that surprised her the most. [read post]
10 May 2018, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
” [Chris Edwards, Cato on Janus v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:45 am by Jason Rantanen
The bottom line is that high damages claims for design patent infringement are going to be much more credible in the wake of Apple v. [read post]