Search for: "DOES 2-25"
Results 281 - 300
of 16,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm
And how does it work in California? [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
(2) Is the assessment under question 1 affected if the work to which the link refers is on a website on the Internet which can be accessed by anyone without restrictions or if access is restricted in some way? [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
Nilima Mandal (2008) was cited to show that in absence of pleadings, no evidence can be considered.The IPAB however held that S 25(2)(e) had been raised by the respondent, and Section 25(2)(e) is a ground for revocation if that the invention so far as claimed in any claim of the complete specification is obvious and clearly does not involve any inventive step, having regard to the matter published as mentioned in clause (b) or having regard to what was… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:56 am
Does 25 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:29 am
The DOI therefore violated 25 C.F.R. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am
Injury Litig., No. 2:18-CV-00136, 2019 WL 6894069, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:38 am
The jury was out 2 1/2 hours. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 4:47 am
Finding that some thought or imagination would be required in order to discern the meaning of the mark MISS NUDE CENTERFOLD SEARCH, the TTAB reversed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark for adult videotapes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm
In the appellate decision, the justices determined "that § 25-320(B) does not require that a separate request be made for retroactive child support. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:46 am
How Does Alimony Work? [read post]
6 May 2007, 9:17 am
Didn't the PTO make out a prima facie case under 2(e)(4) that shifted the burden to the Applicant? [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 4:13 am
Under the Indian Civil Rights Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:37 am
This requirement does not apply to supervisory or managerial employees. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 10:00 am
That is the effect of section 18(3)(b), section 23(2) and section 23(5). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
II, §2, cl. 2. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
May 2, 2005); Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:10 am
Higher claims don't mean higher admin expenses; it does not cost 100X's as much to adjudicate a $10,000 claim vs a $100 claim. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm
The Six things Bill Marler does not eat. [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:42 am
County of Placer, et al. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 25, ordered published onApril 2, 2013, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment entered after sustaining a demurrer to a CEQA action without leave on statute of limitations grounds and denying plaintiffs’ Code of Civil Procedure § 473 motion seeking relief based on mistake or excusable neglect. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
November 25 and December 2, 2008. [read post]
