Search for: "David Paul v. John Williams" Results 281 - 300 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
He would have one Supreme Court to show for it. 1975 - Justice Douglas finally retired, and President Ford selected Judge John Paul Stevens. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Jack Sharman
Saint Paul, Letter to the Romans | On the road to Damascus, Saul famously became Paul. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 21 July 2022, the BBC offered a public apology and agreed to pay damages to the former nanny of Prince William and Prince Harry following the “fabricated” and “false and malicious” allegations made by Martin Bashir that Tiggy Legge-Bourke, now Alexandra Pettifer, had an affair with Prince Charles, in order to secure his world-famous 1995 interview with Princess Diana. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:03 pm by Steve Lubet
After all, “nobody was demanding that John Paul Stevens retire,” and he was 90. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – believed that courts should stay out of partisan-gerrymandering claims, because it is too hard to come up with a manageable test to determine when politics plays too influential a role in redistricting, while four of their colleagues – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Dacre v Grant Despite Steve Coogan’s claim that “This is not, in case the press try to portray it that way, the Steve and Hugh show”, the dispute between Hugh Grant and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre bookended module one. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Paul Bernal has a series of posts about the revised bill: An independent review body for the IP Bill? [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
There’s also a split among lower courts on this very issue, as the petition (cowritten by our very own John Elwood) also explains. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Adkins, she writes was “a fork in the road between Alice Paul and Florence Kelley. [read post]