Search for: "Doe 1-8" Results 281 - 300 of 32,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
No such thing for Indiana.IC 31-11-8-5 Common law marriages entered into after January 1, 1958Sec. 5. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:35 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
For 8 months, the penalty would be: 5% x $10,000 x 8 months = $4,000. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Barracuda Tackle LLC, No 8:20-cv-1538- KKM-AEP, 2021 WL 5998127 (M.D. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:29 am by Nedim Malovic
Analysis of the AG Opinion The AG sets off by observing that the wording of Article 8 does not require the applicant to also be the ‘holder’ of an IP right. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:53 am
  In addition there are 8 other cases under investigation. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:40 am
The CDC reports that since April, 277 persons infected with Salmonella Saintpaul with the same genetic fingerprint have been identified in 28 states and the District of Columbia: Arkansas (2 persons), Arizona (19), California (6), Colorado (1), Connecticut (2), Florida (1), Georgia (7), Idaho (3), Illinois (34), Indiana (7), Kansas (8), Kentucky (1), Maryland (1), Michigan (2), Missouri (4), New Mexico (68), New York (2), North Carolina (1), Ohio… [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:06 am
So, we have three cases:1) Patents issuing before June 8, 1978 - Expire 17 years from issuance.2) Patents issuing after June 8, 1978, on applications filed before June 8, 1995 - Expire later of 20 years from filing date OR 17 years from date of issuance.3) Patents filed on or after June 8, 1995 - Expire 20 years from filing date.Early WithdrawalThe foregoing terms apply to most patents. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:35 am by Jon Sands
Hulen, No. 16-30160 (1-10-18)(Clifton w/Wardlaw & Owens). [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 6:33 am by Christy Love
  The government encouraged the Sixth Circuit to rely on the definition of ‘conviction’ found in USSG § 4A1.2(a)(4) rather than 8 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:57 am by Larry S. Perlman
In a much awaited opinion, the Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision, determined that “they never asked” does not necessarily let an employer off the hook. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 3:30 pm by Peter J. Brown and Alexander Volberding
The guidance reflects new information concerning employer obligations and employee entitlements under both Title 8 Sections 3205 and 3205.1, which, respectively, relate to the COVID-19 Prevention Program (CPP)[1] and workplace COVID-19 outbreaks[2]. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:48 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
The Supreme Court on Friday refused for a second time to block Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which bans abortions as early as six weeks into pregnancy, in what may seem like a misleading 8-1 vote in favor of abortion providers’ attempts to challenge the law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:20 am by Nedim Malovic
KG” used in the course of trade in Germany for ‘games, toys’.In 2021, the Opposition Division partly upheld the opposition on the basis of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR. [read post]