Search for: "Doe v. Massachusetts Trial Court" Results 281 - 300 of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2009, 10:37 pm
That court's decision noted that the "the Second Circuit stands alone in holding that the purchase of a competitor's trademark to trigger internet advertising does not constitute a use for the purposes of the Lanham Act. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:20 pm
 Yesterday, Virginia's Court of Appeals made clear that such a requirement is met when the defense files a demand, and does not require the defense to have the witness subpoenaed. blank">Grant v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 11:12 am
Escalera, however, the Appeals Court then ruled the opposite way on an almost identical case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:03 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  In rejecting the third answer, the motion judge refused to apply a Massachusetts’ decision – Cigna Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
The First Circuit held that a conviction for assault and battery in Massachusetts is categorically not necessarily a crime of violence because it does not require proof of intent. [read post]